Organizational Resilience Strategies in Facing the Post-Pandemic Economy

Authors

  • Ayu Trisanti Universitas Katolik Santo Thomas
  • Ritawati Sirait Universitas Katolik Santo Thomas
  • Lestari Pratiwi Universitas Katolik Santo Thomas

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.65853/jenova.v1i1.110

Keywords:

organizational resilience, adaptive leadership, revenue stability, post-pandemic economy, supplier diversification

Abstract

This study examines the effectiveness of organizational resilience strategies in maintaining revenue stability amid post-COVID-19 economic uncertainty. Employing a quantitative descriptive-correlational design, the study collected data from 200 top managers across various industrial sectors in Indonesia using an online Likert-scale questionnaire, supported by corporate financial reports from 2019 to 2023. Pearson correlation and multiple linear regression analyses were used to assess the relationship between resilience strategies and revenue stability. The findings indicate that all examined strategies have positive and significant effects on revenue stability. Adaptive leadership emerged as the most influential factor, showing the strongest correlation and regression coefficient (r = 0.68; β = 0.37; p < 0.01). Supplier diversification (r = 0.61; β = 0.28) and business process digitalization (r = 0.59; β = 0.23) also contributed substantially, while cash flow management (r = 0.52; β = 0.19) and remote working policies (r = 0.44; β = 0.14) provided significant but relatively smaller effects. The regression model explained 58% of the variance in revenue stability (Adjusted R² = 0.58). This study concludes that adaptive leadership, supplier diversification, digitalization, prudent cash flow management, and flexible work arrangements constitute key organizational resilience practices. The findings contribute to resilience literature by confirming the strategic role of adaptive leadership in sustaining organizational performance during post-pandemic recovery.

References

Company, M. &. (2023). The State of Organizations 2023: Ten shifts transforming organizations. McKinsey & Company. https://www.mckinsey.com/capabilities/people-and-organizational-performance/our-insights/the-state-of-organizations-2023

Duchek, S. (2020). Organizational resilience: A capability-based conceptualization. Business Research, 13(1), 215–246. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40685-019-0085-7

Hamel, G., & Välikangas, L. (2003). The quest for resilience. Harvard Business Review, 81(9), 52–63. https://hbr.org/2003/09/the-quest-for-resilience

Horne III, J. F., & Orr, J. E. (1997). Assessing behaviors that create resilient organizations. Employment Relations Today, 24(4), 29–39. https://doi.org/10.1002/ert.3910240405

Lengnick-Hall, C. A., Beck, T. E., & Lengnick-Hall, M. L. (2011). Developing a capacity for organizational resilience through strategic human resource management. Human Resource Management Review, 21(3), 243–255. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hrmr.2010.07.001

Priyono, A., Moin, A., & Putri, V. N. A. O. (2020). Identifying digital transformation paths in the business model of SMEs during the COVID-19 pandemic. Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity, 6(4), 104. https://doi.org/10.3390/joitmc6040104

Statistik, B. P. (2021). Ekonomi Indonesia 2020 turun sebesar 2,07 persen (c-to-c). Badan Pusat Statistik. https://www.bps.go.id/id/pressrelease/2021/02/05/1811/ekonomi-indonesia-2020-turun-sebesar-2-07-persen

Teece, D. J., Pisano, G., & Shuen, A. (1997). Dynamic capabilities and strategic management. Strategic Management Journal, 18(7), 509–533. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-0266(199708)18:7<509::AID-SMJ882>3.0.CO;2-Z

Downloads

Published

2025-06-30