The Influence of Hybrid Work Models on Employee Productivity and Well-Being

Authors

  • Oslan Juliana Simbolon Universitas Katolik Santo Thomas
  • Thomas H. Sihombing Universitas Katolik Santo Thomas

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.65853/jenova.v1i1.111

Keywords:

hybrid work, productivity, employee well-being, WHO-5, KPI

Abstract

This study examines the impact of hybrid work model implementation on employee productivity and well-being in Indonesian organizations. The hybrid model, combining remote and on-site work, is considered an adaptive post-pandemic strategy with economic and psychological implications. A mixed-methods explanatory sequential design was employed. Quantitative data were collected from 500 employees, measuring productivity through Key Performance Indicators (KPI) extracted from HRIS platforms (SAP SuccessFactors and Workday) and well-being using the WHO-5 Index. Analyses included descriptive statistics, paired t-tests, and linear regression. Complementary qualitative insights were obtained from 30 structured interviews and analyzed thematically. Results show that average KPI scores increased significantly from 77.38 to 81.32 (p < 0.001; Cohen’s d = 1.06), while WHO-5 scores rose from 55.03 to 63.76 (p < 0.001; Cohen’s d = 1.32). However, regression analysis revealed that improved well-being was not directly associated with productivity gains (p = 0.788). Thematic analysis identified four central themes: flexibility and time efficiency, enhanced work-life balance, collaboration challenges, and risks of digital fatigue. The study concludes that hybrid work substantially enhances both productivity and well-being, though their relationship is not linear. Organizational factors, particularly communication, managerial support, and digital workload management are critical for success. These findings contribute to human resource management literature and highlight the strategic significance of hybrid work in sustaining corporate performance in uncertain environments.

References

Babapour Chafi, M., Hultberg, A., & Bozic Yams, N. (2022). Post-Pandemic Office Work: Perceived Challenges and Opportunities for a Sustainable Work Environment. Sustainability, 14(1), 294. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14010294

Bloom, N., Han, R., & Liang, J. (2024). Hybrid Working from Home Improves Retention without Damaging Performance. Nature, 630(8018), 920–925. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-024-07500-2

Diener, E. (1984). Subjective Well-Being. Psychological Bulletin, 95(3), 542–575. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.95.3.542

Drucker, P. F. (1999). Management Challenges for the 21st Century. HarperBusiness.

Forum, H. R. D. (2025). 9 Tren HR di Indonesia yang Perlu Anda Ketahui pada 2025 (3). HRD Forum. https://www.hrd-forum.com/9-tren-hr-di-indonesia-yang-perlu-anda-ketahui-pada-2025-3/

Indotelko. (2023). Sebanyak 62% Karyawan di Indonesia Memilih Bekerja Secara Hybrid. Indotelko. https://www.indotelko.com/read/1700526084/sebanyak-62-karyawan-di-indonesia-memilih-bekerja-secara-hybrid

Kusumawati, B. (2024). The Effect of Hybrid Working on Employee Productivity and Life Balance: A Human Resource Management Perspective. Maneggio, 1(6), 24–32. https://doi.org/10.62872/7mcb4m45

Rasulia, F., Noermijati, & Kurniawati, D. T. (2025). The Influence of Hybrid Working Model on Employee Performance with the Mediation of Remote Management and Effective Monitoring: Study at PT PLN (Persero). International Journal of Research in Business and Social Science (2147-4478), 14(3), 53–59. https://doi.org/10.20525/ijrbs.v14i3.4127

Selular.id. (2023). Survei: 62% Karyawan di Indonesia Pilih Kerja Hybrid, 21% Full Remote. Selular.id. https://selular.id/2023/11/survei-62-karyawan-di-indonesia-pilih-kerja-hybrid-21-full-remote/

Sumiati, S. (2024). The Impact of Hybrid Working on Employee Performance: A Study on Startup Companies in Surabaya. International Journal Business, Management and Innovation Review, 1(4), 130–139. https://doi.org/10.62951/ijbmir.v1i4.117

Downloads

Published

2025-06-30